Der Artikel ist weiterhin als ^^OTHERCONDITION^^ verfügbar.
Autor: John Kronen
ISBN-13: 9783884051016
Einband: Englisch Broschur
Seiten: 189
Gewicht: 305 g
Format: 211x149x13 mm
Sprache: Englisch

Francisco Suarez Selections from De Anima

Liber Conversus
On the Nature of the Soul in General / On the Immateriality and Immortality of the Rational Soul
Table of Contents
Introduction 9
DE ANIMA________
Disputation I: On the Substance of the Soul in General 30
Question 1
Whether the soul is act
in the sense of being a substantial form 30

Question 2
Whether and in what way the soul is first act 45

Question 3
Whether the soul possesses an essential ordination to an organic body 65
Question 4
What the quidditative definition of the soul isand how one definition is proven through another 84
DE ANIMA________ Disputation II 108

Question 3
Whether the principle of understanding in humansis something incorporeal, subsistent, and immortal 108
Bibliography 177
Suarez's De Anima is his second most important philosophical work after his celebrated Metaphysical Disputations, and like the Disputations, it is incredibly thorough. Indeed, it is the most complete treatment of the nature of living beings from an Aristotelian point of view ever penned. In it Suarez treats questions we would now ascribe to such separate disciplines as metaphysics, epistemology, the philosophy of mind, and the philosophy of biology.The selections translated here, the first English translation of any part of the De anima, give the reader a good sample of some of the central metaphysical questions treated in the De anima.
The first selection, consisting of all of Disputation I, provides Suarez's solution to difficult questions concerning the nature of the soul in general; specifically it addresses the way it is first act, its quiddita-tive definition, and its relation to the body, the composite, and the essential accidents of the living organism it partially constitutes.
The second selection, consisting of question 3 of Disputation 2, reviews and defends all the philoso-phical arguments, whether metaphysical or moral, found in the Christian tradition for the conclusion that the rational soul is immaterial and immortal.
ワbersetzung von: John Kronen, Jeremiah Reedy
Translating Authors: John Kronen got his undergraduate degree at Marquette University in 1985, and his doctorate at the State University of New York at Buffalo. He studied under Jorge Gracia at Buffalo, and his dissertation concerned the substantial unity of material substances. He has taught at St. Tho-mas since 1990. His areas of specialty include Baroque Scholasticism, Metaphysics, and Indian Philo-sophy. Jeremiah Reedy Professor Emeritus of Classics specialized in textual criticism and Indo-European linguistics at the University of Michigan. His current interests include Latin and Greek (languages and literature), mythology, and Greek philosophy. His publications include translations and editions of both Greek and Latin works, plus articles on many aspects of Greek philosophy. Since retiring in 2004 he has been doing research, writing, and teaching at the U. of St. Thomas as an adjunct professor.
I: The Science of the Soul
In the medieval university psychology--"the science of the soul"-- occupied a pivotal place in the curriculum because it was con-ceived as forming the bridge between natural philosophy and meta-physics. This fact alone indicates that the medievals conceived of psy-chology very differently from the way we do today. In fact, for the medievals it encompassed many of the questions which are now ad-dressed in such separate disciplines as biology, the philosophy of mind, epistemology, and ethics, as well as psychology. In order to understand the medieval conception of psychology, one must first un-derstand the theological interest the medievals took in the science of the soul, as well as understanding something of the way they adopted the ontology of Aristotle to support a sophisticated intellectual super-structure for all the sciences. And understanding both is necessary for understanding Suarez's De anima since, although Suarez does not chronologically belong to the medieval period, he does intellectually-his cathedral of thought is one of the most imposing monuments of scholastic philosophy and theology, and it provided not only later Catholic but also Protestant thinkers with skillfully wrought intellec-tual weapons with which to defend central Christian doctrines against what they perceived to be threats to such doctrines arising from cer-tain currents of the Enlightenment.
The medieval wedding of Aristotle's thought with Christian Orthodoxy can perhaps best be understood if one bears in mind, both the account of creation found in Genesis, and the doctrine of the resur-rection. If we look at Genesis, we will find that, on the one hand, it makes a clear distinction in kind between different orders of being (what the medievals referred to as "degrees of ontological perfection") while, on the other hand, it affirms a certain continuity between the orders of being, a continuity arising not only from the fact that all or-ders of being were created by God, but also from the fact that God created all material substances from a common matter or stuff, a stuff Genesis declares to be formless and void prior to God's fashioning of celestial and terrestrial beings out of it. God finally fashions Adam's body out of this common stuff and breathes into it a soul, a soul which the majority of Christian thinkers hold to be the ontological basis in man of his bearing God's image and likeness. That the telos of crea-tion is focused on man is indicated by the fact that man was created last, that God made him the terrestrial guardian of the animals, and that, although upon seeing various of His works God declared them to be good, it is only after man's creation that God declares the world to be "very good".
The story of creation in Genesis is obviously opposed to the reductive materialism of the Epicureans, who held that the world came about through the chance collision of the atoms and, further, that all the intrinsic constituents of all things are the same (viz. the atoms), their differences, such as they are, arising only from differences in the arrangement and proportion of the atoms. That Genesis is opposed to this view of things is obvious to contemporary intellectuals due to the fact that the contemporary children of Epicurus, having become em-boldened by the Darwinian theory of evolution, now dominate not only the hard science departments of Western universities, but their social science and philosophy departments as well. That Genesis is no less opposed to other non-materialist world views is not as clear to academics because such views now have no foothold in universities or other respectable intellectual circles, though one can still discern their influence in "New Age" spirituality. We are thinking here of panthe-ism (the most popular current form of which can be found in the quasi deification of "energy", a deification which runs throughout the Star Wars saga), as well as of vario
Autor: John Kronen
ISBN-13:: 9783884051016
ISBN: 3884051016
Verlag: Philosophia
Gewicht: 305g
Seiten: 189
Sprache: Englisch
Sonstiges: Taschenbuch, 211x149x13 mm